كيف يعمل التعرف على اللهجة العربية

The most immediate differences between Arabic dialects are often phonetic. ADI systems leverage these differences by analyzing the acoustic properties of the speech signal.

‍

‍

One of the most well-known phonetic markers is the pronunciation of the classical Arabic consonant qāf (ق). In Cairo and Damascus, it is often realized as a glottal stop [ʔ]. In much of the Gulf, it is pronounced as a voiced velar stop [g]. These systematic variations provide a powerful signal for dialect recognition systems.

‍

Beyond individual consonants, the vowel systems of Arabic dialects show considerable divergence. The phenomenon of imāla, the raising of the vowel /a/ towards /i/ or /e/, is a characteristic feature of many Levantine dialects. Acoustic models for dialect recognition must be sensitive to these subtle differences in vowel quality.

‍

An ADI system learns to hear the subtle phonetic fingerprints left by a speaker's regional background. The pronunciation of a single consonant can be enough to narrow down the origin from North Africa to the Gulf.

Beyond individual sounds, dialects are distinguished by their morphological and syntactic structures. For written text, morphological analysis can reveal dialect-specific patterns in word formation and sentence structure.

‍

One of the most significant divergences is the system of verb conjugation for the future tense:

‍

• Levant: The prefix b- is used (e.g., b-iktub, "he will write").
• Egypt: The prefix ḥa- is common (e.g., ḥa-yiktub).
• Gulf: The classical form sa- is sometimes used in more formal speech.

‍

The system of personal pronouns also shows considerable variation. The first-person singular verb in most dialects begins with a vowel, but in the Maghrebi dialects, it begins with an n-, a feature that sets this dialect group apart.

‍

The sociolinguistic situation of diglossia, where a high-status variety (MSA) and a low-status variety (the local dialect) are used in different social contexts, adds a layer of complexity. In many situations, speakers will code-switch between the two, sometimes within the same sentence. This linguistic mixing can make it difficult for an automatic system to determine the speaker's native dialect.

‍

To address this, some ADI systems incorporate a component that explicitly models code-switching, often by using a multi-task learning approach where the system is trained to simultaneously identify the dialect and detect code-switching.

‍